Memory Work and Data GraphicsSeries: Essay
Summary: “If the statistics are boring, then you’ve got the wrong numbers.” —Edward R. Tufte,
Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd ed., pg. 80
Word Count: 2400
Notes: The winner of this month's Patreon poll!
When we started memory work, it felt like a terrifying, nonsensical quagmire. We had no idea how long it would last, how bad it would be, or whether we were achieving anything. So we did what any nerd would do: we started assembling data.
It took us a few years to settle on a system, which is why we only have proper numbers starting from 2016. But it’s been a huge boon: the morass is now predictable, reliable, and manageable, however unpleasant. With a paper calendar, some spreadsheets, and some graphs, we can track such things as:
• How long it takes to process a memory
• Trends in memory content
• How often we get memory chunks, their minimum, maximum, median, and mean, and greater trends therein
• Our tolerance regarding how many chunks we can take in a month before keeling over, and whether/how that changes.
• The status of our worst trigger
• Is there any pattern in our memory involving the cycle of a year?
• Are our ideas of how to pause memory work true, or are they superstitions?
( Sex, violence, and DATA GRAPHICS! )