![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There are a bunch of plural glossaries out there, but they tend to be lacking in context as to who created a term, where it came from, and how it spread. So, a few days ago, we decided to amass all the many-selved terms we could recall if not who coined it, at least a decent idea as to WHERE and WHEN it came from, with the idea of making an etymological glossary, both textual and visual (in the style of this chart of musical genres/musicians of the 1950s-1970s from Edward Tufte's Visual Explanations).
Right now we're at around 50 terms, ranging from highly unpopular medical terms of the 1800s ("duplex personality" never caught on) up to quoigenic at 2016. We are choosing to halt our charting at around then, because the genic slapfight EXPLODED with a gazillion terms that we never used and have zero interest in documenting, plus we have no idea which terms get fucking USED with any frequency besides traumagenic, endogenic, and quoigenic. (Besides, Pluralpedia probably has that time period covered better.)
Since our earliest medical term in English we have onhand is from 1816 ("double consciousness," used by Mitchell, and I'm pretty sure he yoinked it from the French) that gives us 200 years of many-selved terminological slapfighting in English. (There are a number of German and French sources from the 1800s that probably influenced the English terminology, but I'm choosing to stick with the language I know.)
Because of the nature of the sources I have, and my own upbringing, medical terms are disproportionately represented, and eventually I'll have to make a judgment call as to what terms doctors call us vs. terms we call ourselves, but that's a problem for future me. And I still think it might be valuable to chart which medical terms stuck around (multiple personality vs manifold personality), and also just to see the docs duking it out in the 1800s, especially since my multi community records don't start until 1986.
So far, the main research pools I've been drawing from are:
But I quickly realized there was a big, glaring hole in my research: the Many Voices newsletter archives, which ranges from 1989-2012 (and also I guess that one orphaned 1986 issue of Speaking For Our Selves). 142 newsletters, none searchable or screenreadable. The thought of manually reading through, one by one, made me shudder.
But then I went, "Hey... isn't Orion Scribner unemployed right now?" So I hired them and they went and OCRed the whole kit and kaboodle! What a public service! What a mensch!
Right now, I am completely exhausted and working on my taxes, but when that's out of the way, I plan to upload all of these files to archive.org so everyone can use them. Three cheers for Orion Scribner!
Right now we're at around 50 terms, ranging from highly unpopular medical terms of the 1800s ("duplex personality" never caught on) up to quoigenic at 2016. We are choosing to halt our charting at around then, because the genic slapfight EXPLODED with a gazillion terms that we never used and have zero interest in documenting, plus we have no idea which terms get fucking USED with any frequency besides traumagenic, endogenic, and quoigenic. (Besides, Pluralpedia probably has that time period covered better.)
Since our earliest medical term in English we have onhand is from 1816 ("double consciousness," used by Mitchell, and I'm pretty sure he yoinked it from the French) that gives us 200 years of many-selved terminological slapfighting in English. (There are a number of German and French sources from the 1800s that probably influenced the English terminology, but I'm choosing to stick with the language I know.)
Because of the nature of the sources I have, and my own upbringing, medical terms are disproportionately represented, and eventually I'll have to make a judgment call as to what terms doctors call us vs. terms we call ourselves, but that's a problem for future me. And I still think it might be valuable to chart which medical terms stuck around (multiple personality vs manifold personality), and also just to see the docs duking it out in the 1800s, especially since my multi community records don't start until 1986.
So far, the main research pools I've been drawing from are:
- Goettman, Greaves & Coons. Multiple Personality and Dissociation, 1791-1992: A Complete Bibliography (Man, SO glad we found that book, fed it through the bookscanner, and that Orion Scribner OCRed it for us!)
- fuckin' Astraea's private BBS .txt files from 1992-1995
- alt.support.dissocation (1994-2024, RIP)
- the Sidran Foundation's glossary from 1998 (linked a bunch in alt.support.dissociation, also surprisingly good at saying where it got its terms from--I might've helped chase where "blending" came from, thanks to it!)
- Eclective's soulbonding glossary from 2001?
- Anachronic Army's glossary from 2001
- The Pavilion Hall glossary (which yoinked Anachronic Army's in 2002)
- fuckin' Astraea's earliest glossary (which yoinked Pavilion Hall's in 2003)
- Eclective's soulbonding glossary from 2004
But I quickly realized there was a big, glaring hole in my research: the Many Voices newsletter archives, which ranges from 1989-2012 (and also I guess that one orphaned 1986 issue of Speaking For Our Selves). 142 newsletters, none searchable or screenreadable. The thought of manually reading through, one by one, made me shudder.
But then I went, "Hey... isn't Orion Scribner unemployed right now?" So I hired them and they went and OCRed the whole kit and kaboodle! What a public service! What a mensch!
Right now, I am completely exhausted and working on my taxes, but when that's out of the way, I plan to upload all of these files to archive.org so everyone can use them. Three cheers for Orion Scribner!
no subject
Date: 2025-04-06 10:01 pm (UTC)-The Silvermoon Team
no subject
Date: 2025-04-07 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-07 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-07 03:22 pm (UTC)I SUSPECT it came from the Troops for Truddi Chase’s “the Front Runner” from When Rabbit Howls in 1987, but haven’t proven it and still need to go through S4OS and early Many Voices. It’s clear Bill and Sybil from Sexual Portraits didn’t coin the term! And I’ve been wrong before—for example, “system” seems to come from IFS, but “parts has been proven to predate it!
EDIT: Okay, I dug into S4OS and MV, and though I saw no reference in S4OS (though it's just one issue, and at times the scan quality is bad, so I should go through manually just to make sure), it was being used in Many Voices by the time of April 1989: at the bottom of page 6, someone going by SD says, "We are taking turns, sharing some experiences, and having patience with whoever is 'up front' at the time. We are a family now, so no one is alone."
It wasn't COMMONLY used, though; the next use of it isn't until June 1990, page 8, from Lynn D.: "We don't 'switch' radically in public, though someone may come to the front to say something once in a while." Those are the only uses I can find that could be before Sexual Portraits, and it's always "front" as a noun, not a verb, which is how Sybil and Bill use it: "She hardly ever appears in public, preferring to let Holiday, Sybil Holiday, and Mistress Sybil front for her."
Unfortunately, it turns out my ebook of When Rabbit Howls is corrupted, and the replacement I got keeps crashing my machine. So that's just going to have to wait for checking til another time. (God, what a pain.)
EDIT AGAIN: Okay, I finally got When Rabbit Howls up and running (that took way longer and was more obnoxious than expected) and yes, the front terms seem to come from them. This would explain why the term isn't used in S4OS; my issue predates When Rabbit Howls.
Besides the Front Runner herself, "Front Runner" seems to be a term for anyone we now call a fronter. (Chapter Seven: "Any Troop member who wanted to be a part-time Front Runner first had to travel with the Outrider...") There's also this line from chapter 5: "Nails, a Troop member who dealt with rejection, charged up front. Nails was now 'sitting forward' in the mind of the woman who could still hear and operate, and therefore believed that the actions and words were her own." The term "up front" is used multiple times, and in Chapter Eighteen, there's "Certain informed Troop minds surged to the forefront, intent on a single act—to protect that which was now in grave danger." The Troops also refer to "the front lines" in Chapter Twenty, which gives context for their terminology: armies have fronts they battle on.
How the term "broke containment" and made it to the kinksters by 1990, I don't know, but I'd LOVE to find out!
no subject
Date: 2025-04-08 12:46 pm (UTC)What sparked this for me was when we were looking at the Pavilion site hosted on Karitas, while it looks like front was correctly cited, I noticed "Fronting" was credited to Shaytar. We couldn't find anything on their website when we looked, but I also know they have other online presences and I'm not familiar with that outside of their essays.
Out of curiosity too I decided to check alt.support.dissociation where it's archived in Google groups and it looks like it was first used very sporadically around 1996-1998, and I'm not sure if that tracks with Shaytar being credited as the coiner for fronting specifically.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-08 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-05-10 10:05 am (UTC)-Amaranthus
no subject
Date: 2025-05-10 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-05-10 10:02 am (UTC)...which is to say, I guess, it's been a long time, but we still intensely regret having had a role in the misinformation spread by Pavilion and the misinformed view it promoted of itself. (It was very good at making people think it was this important, elite organization that almost no one met the criteria to join, but very bad at doing actual activism.)
-Julian & Amaranthus
no subject
Date: 2025-05-10 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-08 08:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-05-10 04:34 pm (UTC)