We're endogenic friendly and even the DSM acknowledges DID must be differentiated from widely accepted cultural and religious forms of plurality. Of which there's several non-white cultures, including ours, specifically.
Unfortunately, we've had white traumagenic systems be racist and/or engage in ongoing harassment campaigns towards non-white traumagenic systems who are endogenic friendly. While saying they're not racist, of course.
There's a deeply concerning trend of traumagenic systems mostly getting their "research" from Instagram, TikTok and Tumblr and a few mediocre websites with sparse and old citations. We have been asked to cite psych journals, which we do. However, in general, obviously non disordered Plurality isn't a research interest by medical authorities. Yet citing sociological research of our own culture which has established forms of spiritual plurality is deemed utterly invalid evidence.
Yet accusers don't need to cite anything themselves. Not one single recent psych journal.
The cherry on top is that they obviously haven't read their precious DSM either: It shows in the active harassment private messages, as well as public "calling out misinformation by [system name]" posts.
We chuckled at discourse / syscourse being called wank. It indeed seems like it.
We're actively seeking wider plural spaces, and generally plain fed up of discourse being shoved in our faces, when we do everything to avoid it.
Re: Thank you for the history lesson & resources
Date: 2023-02-12 03:12 am (UTC)We're endogenic friendly and even the DSM acknowledges DID must be differentiated from widely accepted cultural and religious forms of plurality. Of which there's several non-white cultures, including ours, specifically.
Unfortunately, we've had white traumagenic systems be racist and/or engage in ongoing harassment campaigns towards non-white traumagenic systems who are endogenic friendly. While saying they're not racist, of course.
There's a deeply concerning trend of traumagenic systems mostly getting their "research" from Instagram, TikTok and Tumblr and a few mediocre websites with sparse and old citations. We have been asked to cite psych journals, which we do. However, in general, obviously non disordered Plurality isn't a research interest by medical authorities. Yet citing sociological research of our own culture which has established forms of spiritual plurality is deemed utterly invalid evidence.
Yet accusers don't need to cite anything themselves. Not one single recent psych journal.
The cherry on top is that they obviously haven't read their precious DSM either: It shows in the active harassment private messages, as well as public "calling out misinformation by [system name]" posts.
We chuckled at discourse / syscourse being called wank. It indeed seems like it.
We're actively seeking wider plural spaces, and generally plain fed up of discourse being shoved in our faces, when we do everything to avoid it.